Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Gideon Polya's column >>

GIDEON POLYA

Articles Posted: 147  Links Seeded: 2345
Member Since: 2/2006  Last Seen: 5/19/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

How to get Holy Land interim peace?

Sat Jun 17, 2006 2:22 AM EDT
world-news, us, afghanistan, iraq, israel, war, india, children, uk, racism, palestine, human-rights, peace, nato, holocaust, coalition, infants, mortality, bengal, jewish-holocaust, muslim-holocaust
By Gideon Polya
Advertise | AdChoices

The post-1967 avoidable mortality in the Occupied Palestinian Territories totals 0.3 million; an "interim peace plan" proposes: 2 states; 1967 borders; no militias; joint total security provision; interim Holy Land defense by Israel only; racism banned; reconciliation; access by ALL to ALL the Holy Land; but how to get an interim peace plan NOW?

For some years I have been arguing (like so many others around the world) for peace with justice in Israel/Palestine and have published various versions of an "interim peace plan" (e.g. do a Google search for "interim peace plan" ; see: http://mwcnews.net/content/view/5175/42/ ). I was recently asked "tell me how we can get your plan into implementation mode" by a courageous and good writer from the Holy Land. This excellent question has sparked me into writing this detailed essay arising from similar thoughts expressed in a prior essay entitled "Paradigm shifts for saving the world" (see: http://mwcnews.net/content/view/7373/42/ ).

My 'interim peace plan" for the Holy Land is designed from the perspective of MOTHER & CHILD i.e. interim peace with justice to stop the killing NOW. This "interim peace plan" simply involves: 2 states; return to the legal, internationally-agreed 1967 borders; militia disarmament; joint provision of airport-level total security for the Holy Land; interim defense of the Holy Land by Israel alone (the Israelis would presently accept nothing less); human rights guaranteed for all; racism, bigotry and incitement illegal; reconciliation after the fashion of post-Apartheid South Africa; and secure access by ALL to ALL of the Holy Land.

The important question put to me is how can this rational "interim peace plan" (or, preferably, something even BETTER) be implemented in practice?

Ultimately, the "problem" to be solved is one of "racism" leading to ACTIVE violence and PASSIVE neglect with consequent "avoidable mortality" and "under-5 infant mortality" that EACH YEAR account for about 4,000 avoidable Palestinian deaths, including 2,400 avoidable Palestinian infant deaths – as compared to deaths of Israelis from terrorism totalling 1,113 since 2000 (over 6 years) , 2,178 since 1967 (over 39 years) and 4,758 since 1920 (over 86 years) (for detailed documentation see: http://globalavoidablemortality.blogspot.com/ ).

A crucial parameter for assessing "deaths that could have been avoided" is "avoidable mortality" (technically, "excess mortality"), which is the difference between the actual deaths in a country and the deaths expected in a peaceful, decently-run country with the same demographics. Using UN Population Division and UNICEF data (see: http://esa.un.org/unpp/ and http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/oPt.html ) it can be estimated that the post-1967 "avoidable mortality" and "under-5 infant mortality" in the Occupied Palestinian Territories total about 0.3 million and 0.2 million, respectively (for detailed documentation see: http://globalavoidablemortality.blogspot.com/ ).

Accordingly, even more fundamentally, what is needed is EDUCATION so that the world will discard lies, "spin" and "spin-based untruths" ("slies") and adopt rational, scientific methods to solve the critical problems of the world that ultimately relate to "avoidable mortality" - thus post-invasion avoidable mortality (SO FAR) totals 0.3 million (Occupied Palestine), 0.5 million (Occupied Iraq) and 1.8 million (Occupied Afghanistan).

Annual global avoidable mortality totals 16 million (44,000 DAILY) and the post-1950 global avoidable mortality totals 1.3 BILLION, including a post-1950 avoidable mortality in the Muslim World totalling 0.6 BILLION – a Muslim Holocaust 100 (ONE HUNDRED) times greater than the WW2 Jewish Holocaust (6 million victims) or the contemporaneous but "forgotten", man-made Bengal Famine in WW2 British-ruled India (4 million victims; a 1940s demographic deficit of over 10 million; suggested to have resulted from a British scorched earth policy; and associated with horrendous military and civilian sexual abuse of starving women and girls) (see: http://globalavoidablemortality.blogspot.com/2005/07/forgotten-holocaust-194344-bengal.html ).

Expertly-developed methodology for minimizing "avoidable mortality" is already well-established. Thus World's Best Practice "Rational Risk Management" protocols are practised widely in high risk areas such as aviation, the nuclear industry and defence to minimize RISK of small as well as catastrophic disasters. Rational Risk Management successively involves (a) acquisition of accurate information, (b) scientific analysis of the data (and, most importantly, the critical testing of potentially FALSIFIABLE hypotheses), and (c) sensible SYSTEMIC change to minimize risk in the newly configured system (see: J. Reason, Human error: models and management, British Medical Journal, vol. 320, 768-770, 2000 and http://mwcnews.net/content/view/7373/42/ ).

The Rational Risk Management protocol is routinely applied in high risk areas such as aviation, nuclear power and defence. This is why passenger aviation is vastly safer than going by car, why nuclear power stations are extremely safe and why the ratio of "avoidable post-invasion Iraqi deaths"/"US military deaths" = 0.5 million/2,500 = 200 (as compared to Hitler's order in the Ardeatine Cave massacre for 10 civilian deaths for every German soldier killed by Italian partisans).

Unfortunately in many areas of human activity, from local politics to the Occupation of the West Bank, Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan, the Rational Risk Management protocol is typically perverted to (a) Mainstream media lying by omission and commission, censorship, intimidation and slies ("spin"-based lies) , (b) anti-scientific "spin" involving selective use of asserted facts to support a partisan position, and (c) blame and shame of suitable victims e.g. the Bush "War on Terror" that is in reality a War on Women and Children and which has so far been associated with 2.3 million avoidable deaths in the Occupied Iraqi and Afghan Territories, despite the awful but nevertheless disproportionate reality that the number of Western civilians murdered throughout the world by Muslim-origin non-state terrorism in 40 (FORTY) years totals 7,000 (less than half the number of murders in the US EACH YEAR).

The people critically at RISK in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (and in other lands under brutal foreign occupation, such as Occupied Iraq and Occupied Afghanistan) are the SUBJECT CIVILIANS. The Geneva Conventions for the Protection of Civilians in Time of War (1950) unequivocally demand that the Occupier provide life-sustaining requisites (see: http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/92.htm ) but this requirement is being flagrantly violated by Israel, the US, the US-led Coalition and NATO (see: http://globalavoidablemortality.blogspot.com/ ).

Before an "interim peace plan" can be implemented, those involved must accept a sensible, scientifically-attested Rational Risk Management model and indeed the implicit, underlying Scientific Method. There must be zero tolerance for functional racism, lies, "slies" and "spin".

Peace is the only way but silence kills and silence is complicity. We are obliged to (a) INFORM everyone about abuses of humanity and (b) act ethically in all our dealings with those complicit in such abuses. INFORMING people about sensible approaches to end violence, occupation and avoidable mortality is critical. International SANCTIONS and BOYCOTTS (i.e. ethical exercise of the "free market choice"), as successfully applied to Apartheid South Africa, would help to persuade human rights-abusing Occupying countries that humanity and Rational Risk Management is more profitable – as well as more moral - than racism, violence and injustice.

The traumatizing of millions of innocent children and the killing and mangling must stop. Peace with justice can be implemented NOW.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Gideon Polya's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (5)
simonesq

Gideon - I believe you when you claim to be the Australian biologist Gideon Polya. From your publication history, you seem to be a more-than-competent scientist, and thus I presume you are not a crazy person. However, you need to learn not to write like a crazy person (if you are interested in persuading anyone here).

First: WRITING IN ALL CAPS MAKES YOU LOOK LIKE A CRAZY PERSON. On the Internet, it is a style commonly adopted by morons and teenagers. You should avoid it. Italics or bold is a cleaner way to add emphasis.

Second: Copying and pasting the same text into all your comments and articles is not a good idea. It leads people to stop reading your posts. Also, it makes it look like you're just here to be a loudspeaker.

Third: The second rule counts double if the pasted text ruins the logical cohesion of your post. Here, you raise a good question "how can this be implemented?" and then instead of answering, you paste your usual global avoidable mortality text.

Fourth: Linking to your blogspot page in every post is annoying and borderline-abusive of the Newsvine Code of Honor. Maybe just link in your profile?

You have some good ideas, but I think most Newsvine readers simply ignore you. It doesn't have to be that way.

  • 11 votes
Reply#1 - Sat Jun 17, 2006 4:05 AM EDT
Gideon Polya

simonesq - thank you for the compliments and for your editorial comments, especially about capitals - if in fact my acutely serious humane message is being ignored then I will have to lift my game. However I was not "copying and pasting" (there are only so many ways you can articulate gross war-linked avoidable mortality and under-5 infant mortality statistics and some cogent and efficient phrases in one's mind, like those of the Lord is my Shepherd or the National Anthem, are inevitably re-used) and I would be delighted to be able to quote sources other than UN, UNICEF or myself (in 4 decades of scientific publishing I got used to quoting the most pertinent references) - but unfortunately lying, racist, holocaust-ignoring, egregiously unethical and immoral Anglo-American Mainstream media resolutely refuse to report the quantitative actuality of horrendous mortality associated with US or US-backed violence in the Middle East and Central Asia.

A humanitarian I immensely admire is Polish underground hero Jan Karski who risked his life in 1942 getting to see what was happening in the Warsaw Ghetto, and getting near a notorious Nazi concentration camp. He then escaped from Nazi-occupied Europe and tried to tell a generally unbelieving world what was going on (even an important Jewish adviser to FDR refused to believe him). When the Allies were finally convinced, they issued a statement (17 December 1942, 30 months before the end of the war in Europe) acknowledging the reality of the ongoing extermination of European Jewry but still did nothing to specifically save the Jews. 6 million Jews died, but, for example, the Jews of Hungary could have been saved - read Alex Weissberg, "Advocate for the Dead. The Story of Joel Brand" (Andre Deutsch, London, 1958); Walter Laqueur "The Terrible Secret. Suppression of the Truth about Hitler's "Final Solution" (Penguin, London, 1980); and Bernard Wasserstein "Britian and the Jews of Europe 1939-1945" ( Institute of Jewish Affairs & Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1988).

Thanks to "silence" and "unresponsiveness" I have only a very few blood relatives scattered across the world. Silence kills and silence is complicity. Decent people are obliged to inform others about egregious human rights violations - we cannot walk by on the other side. If that involves repeatedly saying the equivalent of things such as "thou shall not kill" and "thou shall not kill children" and providing the quantitative evidence of mass murder and passive genocide then so be it. And none of this response has been cut or pasted - it all comes directly from the mind and the heart.

  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Sat Jun 17, 2006 9:02 PM EDT
Yaakov

Gideon -

I agree with everything that simonesq wrote above. What I have noticed most regarding your comments is that they:

  • Feature blocks of CAPITAL LETTERS which take away from the seriousness of whatever you are saying
  • Invariably switch over (from whatever topic) to a couple of paragraphs (that look to be copied and pasted) regardign Global Avoidable Mortality, with a link to your blog at the end

This is annoying and definitely causes people to view your comments with a certain disdain. I agree that if you want people here to take you seriously (as I know that you take it seriously yourself) it would really help if you put some effort into reflecting this in your writing style and habits.

    #1.2 - Sun Jun 18, 2006 9:25 AM EDT
    Reply
    Djehuty

    Gideon your style is unique and violates some mild Internet taboos, but I think simonesq's comment misses the undeniable passion and commitment to humanity and justice which comes through in your articles. This article, as always, communicates that as well as the scientific facts - and it does it well.

    Actually I think that breaking a few unimportant taboos should not be considered a serious impediment to the transmission of your ideas, and I'd like to put my viewpoint that simon has been a little harsh in saying that you come across like a crazy person. In fact the extremely courteous and reasonable reply you gave simon's comment is testament to the fact that you are like a number here a sane person who faces harsh truths about the world. I'd like to think we're still sane, anyway ;-)

    • 2 votes
    Reply#2 - Sat Jun 17, 2006 10:31 PM EDT
    Yaakov

    Gideon -

    Although I am trying, I am still failing to see where in this post you are addressing the topic of how your plan for peace can be implemented now. I am following you through the first three paragraphs, including your listing of what this peace plan would entail. However, right when it seemed you were going to present steps regarding how this plan could be implemented, you switch over to Global Avoidable Mortality mode. I agree that because of the conflict in Israel and in the Middle East as a whole, there are groups of people who suffer through physical injuries and poor health conditions. This is sad and unfortunate, and cannot be wholly blamed on one side or the other.

    However, simply getting everyone to acknowledge that there is improper health care for refugees in camps in Gaza will not cause everyone to suddenly be friends. I am going ot copy some points from a comment on another post, where I was asking how exactly your plan could be implemented immediately:

    You make a claim that your "peace plan" is something that could be "implemented immediately". However, based on the details of your plan, I think that it would be near impossible to implement anything like this within the next few years. Here is why:

    • Bilateral Will - how can you implement a demand that everyone sincerely stop fighting and honestly become friends. I am not saying that it is a bad goal. I just don't find it realistic that with the stakes so high, and such a long history, that everyone will suddenly just "be friends".
    • Return to 1967 Borders - you are asking Israel to give up its holiest places (Old City of Jerusalem and Hevron), expel more than close to a half of a million people (many of whom live in Jerusalem, land that Israel has annexed) and abandon territory that is strategically important for Israel's defense. This is something that could be "implemented immediately"?
    • Palestinian Militia Disarmament - Again, a nice thought, but how are you going to do this? Ask them nicely? How can this be implemented immediately?
    • Racism and incitement made illegal - This is already illegal in Israel. How are you going to force this in Gaza?

    I understand that you hate the fact that there is "Avoidable Mortality" anywhere in the world and that you view Israel as a major source of this. However, I find your proposed "peace plan" to include only wishful thinking and unrealistic hopes, without mentioning anything as to how it will be accepted by both sides, how its specifics could be "implemented immediately" or how it will ensure that Israel is secure and that violence stops after said plan is implemented.

    Simply put, the topic of this article is "Hot to get Holy Land interim peace". After going through the post, I am still waiting for an answer.

    • 2 votes
    Reply#3 - Sun Jun 18, 2006 9:33 AM EDT
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
    Newsvine Privacy Statement
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    FUN STUFF:
    • Leaderboard |
    • E-Mail Alerts |
    • Top of the Vine |
    • Newsvine Live |
    • Newsvine Archives |
    • The Greenhouse |
    COMPANY STUFF:
    • Code of Honor |
    • Company Info |
    • Contact Us |
    • Jobs |
    • User Agreement |
    • Privacy Policy |
    • About our ads
    LEGAL STUFF:
    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com