Visit Gideon Polya's column >>

GIDEON POLYA

Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 136; Links Seeded: 1115
Member Since: 2/2006Last Seen: 11/25/2009

0.7 million Iraq deaths - top expert endorses Lancet methods

advertisement

Professor Mike Toole, Centre for International Health, Melbourne - methodology used in The Lancet study is consistent with "standard practice" survey methodology for estimating avoidable (excess) mortality.

Professor Mike Toole is from the Centre for International Health, Macfarlane Burnet Institute for Medical Research and Public Health, Melbourne. His comments were in a letter toThe Age newspaper, Melboiurne, Australia published on Saturday October 14, 2006 (search the letter archive using the link provided).

Key quote from this top medical epidemiological expert: " The methodology used is consistent with survey methodology that has long been standard practice in estimating mortality in populations affected by war. For example, the Burnet Institute and International Rescue Committee (IRC) used the same methods to estimate mortality in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The findings of this study received widespread media attention and were accepted without reservation by the US and British governments. The Macfarlane Burnet Institute for Medical Research and Public Health's Centre for International Health endorses this study."

Comment: In addition, the estimates of 655,000 post-invasion Iraqi avoidable deaths (excess deaths) is in good agreement with estimates from 3 separate data sets that have been publicly available for several years, specifically (1) from UN Population Division data (563,000); (2) UNICEF data (639,000); and (3) unamended estimates published in The Lancet in October 2004 (791,000) (for details see: http://mwcnews.net/content/view/10149/42/ ).

The latest estimates - by a top medical epidemiologists, from a top medical department in a top US university, peer-reviewed by top experts and published in a top medical journal - have been dishonestly denied and offensively disparaged by the war criminal UK, US and Australian Governments.

The prior estimates in categories 1-3 have been publicly available for several years but have been remorselessly ignored by lying, racist Western politicians, officials and corporate media in a continuing process of sustained, racist holocaust denial.

The awful truth is even more awful: thus from UN Population Division Data the post-invasion avoidable deaths in Occupied Iraq and Occupied Afghanistan (as of October 2006) are 563,000 and 2,090,000, respectively, for a total of 2,653,000 avoidable deaths; by way of comparison, the corresponding post-invasion under-5 infant mortality figures are 437,000 and 1,665,000, respectively, for a total of 2,102,000 under-5 infant deaths (i.e. numerically about 80% of the total avoidable mortality) (for details see: http://mwcnews.net/content/view/10149/42/ ).

What is urgently needed is zero tolerance for politician, official and media lying and spin; cessation of the Bush Wars; public scrutiny of the lying and spin by politicians, officials and media; compensation for the Iraqi and Afghan victims; and arraignment of the main Coalition perpetrators (notably Bush and Blair) before the International Criminal Court (ICC).

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
6.2
{"commentId":329532,"authorDomain":"gregh"}

I never thought to question the Iraq Body Count figure. Thanks for helping me understand and question these unfathomable statistics of human suffering.

Now, folks, what are we going to do about it? Getting people to the polls to vote these criminals out of office seems the order of the day. To do nothing is to allow the carnage to continue "until the job is done", whatever that could possibly mean. George and Laura Bush care nothing for the under-fives who die because they ventured out for a drink of water while the bullets were flying in Falujah. Recall the protective thoughts you projected toward your baby son or daughter or brother or sister. Then think what these statistics imply for the inner state of those who have endured a five-year occupation. Compassion is in short supply, displaced by one part vengeance and four parts greed.

{"commentId":329532,"threadId":"47776","contentId":"399561","authorDomain":"gregh"}
  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Sat Oct 14, 2006 7:56 AM EDT
{"commentId":329613,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}

Well said Greg. Time to vote the whole lot of them out of office. With rare exception they're rotten to the core. Gideon, as always thanks for keeping some focus on the grim figures. Too often this PR machine moves debate to whether the figures are accurate and and other side debates. People need to be reminded killing is the only effective Washington policy has.

{"commentId":329613,"threadId":"47776","contentId":"399561","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Sat Oct 14, 2006 9:51 AM EDT
Reply
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"47776","isPrivate":false}
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
{"threadId":"47776","contentId":"399561"}
Start TrackingStart Tracking
Stop TrackingStop Tracking