Hillary Clinton supported Sanctions vs Iraq (1990-2003, 1.2 million under-5 infant deaths), the Iraq War (2003-2008, 0.6 million infant deaths) and the Afghan War (2.2 million infant deaths), 4 million in all, and 90% avoidable.
These estimates come from publicly available data published by UNICEF (see: http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/index.html ) and corroborated by data published by the United Nations Population Division (see: http://esa.un.org/unpp/ ).
The Awful Truth is only a few mouse-clicks away but the variously Ignorant or Evil Democrat Primary voters in New Hampshire were quite happy to give majority support to a WOMAN who is COMPLICIT in the avoidable deaths of 3.6 million utterly innocent Asian children.
Just remember that "allomothering" ("aunt behaviour") is a fundamental, hard-wired behavioural trait in social primates such as Man, Monkeys and Apes and that it involves an instinctive "care" for the young of Others (and indeed often in humans care and affection for the infants of other SPECIES).
An American WOMAN candidate for President who is complicit in the mass murder of 3.6 million infants is grossly violating this fundmantal "allomothering" and "aunt behaviour" trait - if not the detestable and evil mores of American public life and the American and the Bush-ite or neo-Bush-ite Western Murdochracies..
For a detailed account of America's genocidal history leading up to this shocking endorsement of a WOMAN complicit in one of the major mass infanticide episodes of human history see "US mass infanticide. 4 million reasons why Hillary Clinton is not fit to be president": http://mwcnews.net/content/view/19275/42/ .
In short, the moral argument is that "thou shalt not kill" and "thou shalt not kill children" (either actively through bombs and bullets or passively by denial of life-sustaining resources unequivocally demanded of Occupiers and War-makers by Articles 55 and 56 of the Geneva Convention relative to Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (see: http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/instree/y4gcpcp.htm ). Please read these articles, QUOTE:
To the fullest extent of the means available to it the Occupying Power has the duty of ensuring the food and medical supplies of the population; it should, in particular, bring in the necessary foodstuffs, medical stores and other articles if the resources of the occupied territory are inadequate.
The Occupying Power may not requisition foodstuffs, articles or medical supplies available in the occupied territory, except for use by the occupation forces and administration personnel, and then only if the requirements of the civilian population have been taken into account. Subject to the provisions of other international Conventions, the Occupying Power shall make arrangements to ensure that fair value is paid for any requisitioned goods.
The Protecting Power shall, at any time, be at liberty to verify the state of the food and medical supplies in occupied territories, except where temporary restrictions are made necessary by imperative military requirements.
To the fullest extent of the means available to it, the Occupying Power has the duty of ensuring and maintaining, with the cooperation of national and local authorities, the medical and hospital establishments and services, public health and hygiene in the occupied territory, with particular reference to the adoption and application of the prophylactic and preventive measures necessary to combat the spread of contagious diseases and epidemics. Medical personnel of all categories shall be allowed to carry out their duties.
If new hospitals are set up in occupied territory and if the competent organs of the occupied State are not operating there, the occupying authorities shall, if necessary, grant them the recognition provided for in Article 18. In similar circumstances, the occupying authorities shall also grant recognition to hospital personnel and transport vehicles under the provisions of Articles 20 and 21.
In adopting measures of health and hygiene and in their implementation, the Occupying Power shall take into consideration the moral and ethical susceptibilities of the population of the occupied territory." END QUOTE
Consulting the World Health Organization (WHO: http://www.who.int/countries/en/ ) reveals that total annual medical expenditure in US dollars permitted by the war criminal US-led Occupiers is only $19 (Occupied Afghanistan) and $135 (Occupied Iraq) as compared to the following hugely greater values for the racist, war-criminal, mass paedocidal (mass pedocidal) US Alliance Occupier Countries: $3,123 (Australia), $3,173 (Canada), $3,040 (France), $3,171 (Germany), $2,560 (the UK) and $6.096 (the US).
Hillary Clinton is surely AWARE of these horrendous realities as an informed, leading American politician; as wife of a former 2-term US President; as a candidate who publicly endorses the actions of former president Bill Clinton and his UN Representative and thence Secretary of State Madeleine "the price was worth it" Albright (carting them around on her current electioneering); and from her undoubted KNOWLEDGE of the famous question put to Madeleine Albright in 1996 by Lesley Stahl on "60 Minutes":
"We have heard that half a million children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?" Albright replied: "I think this is a very hard choice, but the price — we think the price is worth it."
In 1945 the citizens of conquered Nazi Germany adopted a protocol in relation to the immensity of the Holocaust that can be summarized by the acronym CAAAA (C4A) and involving Cessation of the killing, Acknowledgment of the killing, Apology for the Killing, Amends for the Killing and Assertion "Never again" in relation to mass murder and related war crimes. Unfortunately the RECENT German Governments have become complicit in the Afghan Genocide (post-invasion excess deaths 3-6 million) and hence have evidently scrubbed "Never Again" from their neo-con agenda (see "US-corrupted Germany and Japan resume horrendous war crimes": http://mwcnews.net/content/view/7616/26/ ).
However unlike the ex-Nazi Germans in 1945, Racist Zionist-beholden Hillary Clinton has NOT Ceased supporting huge financial support for the killing of Muslim infants from Congress; she has NOT Acknowledged the crimes; she has NOT Apologized for the crimes; she has NOT offered Amends for the crimes; and one can reasonably assume that as a red-blooded, American Establishment politician she is NOT Asserting "Never Again" (that would surely fly in the face of a sustained 4 century American record of merciless genocide) (for a summary see: http://mwcnews.net/content/view/19275/42/ ; pp48-49, "Body Count. Global avoidable mortality since 1950" (G.M. Polya, Melbourne, 2007: http://mwcnews.net/content/view/1375/247/ and http://globalbodycount.blogspot.com/ ; and see also William Blum's "Rogue State") .
Analysis of UN-derived data reveals that in 2008 on current projections Bush America will be responsible for (a) 850,000 excess deaths in US- or US surrogate-occupied Territories (Occupied Haiti, Somalia, Palestine, Iraq and Afghanistan ) of whom well over 50% will be kids and (b) 550,000 avoidable under-5 infant deaths in these Occupied Territories in 2008 or 550,000/365 = 1,500 avoidable under-5 year old infant deaths DAILY (see "How many kids will Bush America kill in 2008?": http://www.countercurrents.org/polya050108.htm ).
One assumes from her warmongering voting record and the warmongering, mass infanticidal company Hillary Clinton keeps, that the killing, the mass murder, and the mass infanticide will largely continue under Hillary Clinton as America's first WOMAN president – and whether they like it or not, that is what the Primary Voters in New Hampshire were in effect voting for.
THE KEY ISSUE (from a global perspective) in the forthcoming US Presidential election SHOULD be whether, after 4 centuries of carnage, America is prepared to stop the mass murder of innocent non-European children.