On 1 September 1939 Nazi Germany invaded Poland and on 3 September 1939 the UK declared war on Germany. The Soviet Union (USSR) occupied the eastern third of Poland. In 1941 Nazi Germany invaded the Soviet Union.
Nazi Germany was finally crushed by the Red Army in 1945 after the loss of some 20 million Soviet Union lives.
Deaths from violence and deprivation in the racist, genocidal German "lebensraum" program of Germanizing Poland in the 68 month (5.7 year) period from September 1939 to May 1945 totalled about 6 million out of a population of about 28 million. The average population of Poland in this period would accordingly have been about 25 million (see "Occupation of Poland (1939-1945): http://wapedia.mobi/en/Treatment_of_Polish_citizens_by_occupiers ).
1a. Accordingly, the "annual death rate" of Poles in WW2 expressed as a percentage = 6 million people killed x 100/(5.7 years x 25 million people) = 4.2%.
1b. Another way of expressing this carnage is as "deaths per million of population per year" = 6,000,000 killed / (5.7 years x 25 million people) = 42,105 deaths per million per year.
Decent folk believe that "all men are created equal and have an unalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness". Accordingly it is important to compare the Polish Holocaust with other atrocities associated with World War 2.
According to Professor Sir Martin Gilbert, 5.65 million Jews were killed in WW2 out of an initial population of 8.18 million. The average Jewish population in WW2 was 5.35 million (see Gilbert, M. (1969), Jewish History Atlas (Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London); Gilbert, M. (1982), Atlas of the Holocaust (Michael Joseph, London)) .
2a. Accordingly, the "annual death rate" of Jews killed by the Nazis in WW2 expressed as a percentage = 5.65 million people killed x 100/(5.7 years x 5.35 million people) = 18.5%.
2b. Alternatively, this can be expressed as "killings per million of population per year" = 5,650,000 people killed /5.7 years x 5.35 million people = 185, 276 deaths per million of population per year.
Related data from Professor Gilbert is 65,000 French Jews killed out of a population of 300,000 (average WW2 population 268,000) in Nazi-occupied France and accordingly death rate estimates can be made.
3a. "Annual death rate" of French Jews killed in WW2 expressed as a percentage = 65,000 people killed x 100/(5 years x 268,000 people) = 4.9%.
3b. "Killings per million of population per year" for French Jews under the Nazis = 65,000 people killed /(5 years x 0.268 million) = 48,507
A further shocking instance of mass murder in WW2 was that of Australian prisoners of war (POWs) of the Japanese after the fall of Singapore in February 1942. Of 22,000 Australians taken prisoner by the Japanese (mostly in Malaysia and Singapore) , 8,000 perished in the period February 1942 to August 1945 (3.5 years). The average number of Australian POWs was accordingly (22,000 + 14,000)/2 = 18,000 (see Tim Bowden, "Prisoners of War: Australians under Nippon", Australian ABC Radio National: ": http://www.abc.net.au/rn/summer/summer2002/pow.htm ).
4a. Accordingly, the "annual death rate" of Australian POWs of the Japanese in WW2 expressed as a percentage was 8,000 killed x 100/(3.5 years x 18,000 people) = 12.7%
4b. Alternatively, this can be expressed as "killings per million of population per year" = 8,000 people killed /3.5 years x 0.018 million people = 126,984 deaths per million of population per year.
According to UNICEF (see: http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/afghanistan_statistics.html ), 338,000 under-5 year old infants died in 2007 in US Alliance-occupied Afghanistan, 90% avoidably and due to war criminal US Alliance Occupier non-supply of life-sustaining food and medical requisites demanded unequivocally of Occupiers by Articles 55 and 56 of the Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (see: http://www.un-documents.net/gc-4.htm ) . According to the UN Population Division the under-5 year old population in Occupied Afghanistan in 2007 was 4.86 million.
5a. Accordingly, the "annual death rate" of Occupied Afghanistan infants expressed as a percentage is 0.338 million x 100/4.86 million = 7.0% (as compared to 0.1% in Occupier country Apartheid Australia)..
5b. Alternatively, this can be expressed as "deaths per million of population per year" = 338,000/4.86 million = 69,547.
The bottom line in any comparative analysis of violent wrongdoing is consequential death. The current "annual death rate" for Occupied Afghan under-5 year old infants under the US Alliance is 7% - as compared to that of 4% (for Poles under the Nazis in WW2), 5% (French Jews under the Nazis and the Nazi-collaborator Vichy régime in WW2), 13% (Australian POWs of the Japanese in WW2) and 19% (Jews in Nazi-occupied Europe).
The "annual death rate" in "deaths per million per year" is currently about 70,000 for Occupied Afghan under-5 year old infants – as compared to that of 42,000 (for Poles under the Nazis in WW2), 49,000 (French Jews under the Nazis and the Nazi-collaborator Vichy régime in WW2), 127,000 (Australian POWs of the Japanese in WW2) and 185,000 (Jews in Nazi-occupied Europe).
Axis leaders and generals responsible for the carnage of WW2, including the specific atrocities summarized above, were tried and variously punished. The German people adopted a post-war protocol that can be summarized by the acronym CAAAA (C4A) – Cessation of the killing, Acknowledgment of the crimes, Apology for the crimes, Amends and Assertion "never again to anyone".
However the remorseless active and passive killing of the ongoing Afghan Holocaust continues uninterrupted. The Afghan Holocaust has been associated so far with post-invasion non-violent excess deaths totalling 3.2 million; post-invasion violent deaths of up to 4 million (if the ratio of post-invasion violent/non-violent excess deaths is 1.3 as in Occupied Iraq); post-invasion under-5 year old infant deaths total 2.3 million; and refugees total 3-4 million with a further 2.5 million Pashtun refugees generated in NW Pakistan under Obama's war policies – an Afghan Holocaust and also an Afghan Genocide as defined by Article 2 of the UN Genocide Convention (see: http://www.edwebproject.org/sideshow/genocide/convention.html ) .
In relation to the Afghan Holocaust there is no CAAAA (C4A), no Cessation of the killing, no Acknowledgment of the crimes, no Apology for the crimes, no Amends and no Assertion "never again to anyone". Indeed the French and Germans in particular are violating "never again to anyone" by their obscene participation in the Afghan Holocaust and Afghan Genocide. George Bush, Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, Barack Hussein Obama (BHO), Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, John Howard, Kevin Rudd, Stephen Harper, Nicolas Sarkozy, Angela Merkel and their war criminal associates and underlings should be arraigned before the International Criminal Court (ICC) for war crimes, including the mass murder of children (mass infanticide, mass pedocide, mass paedocide).
Thou shalt not kill children (see: http://mwcnews.net/content/view/19454/42/ ).
In his 2005 Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech, Jewish British playwright Harold Pinter stated in relation to the Iraqi Genocide: "We have brought torture, cluster bombs, depleted uranium, innumerable acts of random murder, misery, degradation and death to the Iraqi people and call it 'bringing freedom and democracy to the Middle East'. How many people do you have to kill before you qualify to be described as a mass murderer and a war criminal? One hundred thousand? More than enough, I would have thought. Therefore it is just that Bush and Blair be arraigned before the International Criminal Court of Justice." (see: http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/literature/laureates/2005/pinter-lecture-e.html ).
In relation to the ongoing atrocity of the Afghan Holocaust one is compelled to paraphrase the late Harold Pinter thus: "How many people do you have to kill before you qualify to be described as a mass murderer and a war criminal? 3-7 million? More than enough, I would have thought. Therefore it is just that Bush, Blair, Obama , Brown and their cronies be arraigned before the International Criminal Court of Justice."
For an outstanding "analysis" of why liars figure and figures lie -- see this article. The term "excess deaths" is meaningless outside of the context that the fact of the matter in both Iraq and Afghanistan it's native killing native for the most part. Of course, this is lost on those who would blame the West for every problem extant on the globe.
Obama is treating Afghanistan just like LBJ handled Viet Nam. More troops, more body bags.
The War in Iraq has caused countless deaths, and it was an elective war that the U.S. waged ( with a "coalition of the willing," most prominently the British) based on false intelligence. The American people allowed ourselves to be duped, and the result has been disastrous.
The War in Afghanistan has crossed over into Pakistan and the efforts and goals are ill-defined. We have left Afghanistan in shambles, just as Russia had done a generation before.
Mr. Pinter was right to denounce the Iraq War. We must pull out and help the nation rebuild. I would also like to see a withdrawal from Afghanistan. It's time.
native killing native for the most part. Of course, this is lost on those who would blame the West for every problem
Natives didn,t kill natives before occupation especially in Iraq. Sectarian violence and chaos and insurgency erupted after dismanling army and police
Natives didn,t kill natives before occupation especially in Iraq.
Part of the problem with what often appears on NV-- sometimes users will just post anything that pops into their mind-- without feeling any need for it to be factual.
But then-- most people who've been here a while already know that ...
Exellent link, btw, Bill Harrison.
Prof. Dr. Harry Krishna (a proud "reader of this column")
sometimes users will just post anything that pops into their mind
This better applies to your post and the one you.r commenting at that assumes by turning to meanless sarcasm that chaos and killing in Iraq started before American ocupation
But then-- most people who've been here a while already know that
This also applies perfectly to your anti-muslem propaganda
The Iraq war did wonders to liberate in Iraq. Now it's all peace and quite and stable....(sarc).
Continous military spending (billions upon billions) by the countries of the worlds simply takes away from the poor and needy the opprotunity of rise up and become civilized members of the society and control the fires of wars.
Billions have been spent by special interests on world conflicts with still no clear signs of control of conflicts and that can turn out to be bigger wars.
Only a small percetage of that spent on welfare of the populations (infrastruture, institution, education and jobs) at a timely manner would have changed the baseline causes of the wars and would have served better purpose to control the reasons of these wars and subsequent death and destruction.
It is a visious circle.
Civilized nations to be civilized and rich must support military industrial complex and launch wars for Oil , hence they indulge on the subsequent atrocities brought out by their wars and they ignore the high mortality caused by their modern devillish weapons . Genocide denial - by the so called civilized nations - is necessary to keep military industrial complex running and lucrative
It is a visious circle.
Civilized nations to be civilized and rich must support military industrial complex and launch wars for Oil , hence they indulge on the subsequent atrocities brought out by their wars and they ignore the high mortality caused by their modern devillish weapons . Genocide denial - by the so called civilized nations - is necessary to keep military industrial complex running and lucrative
But-- don't you think that this will change under Obama?
Do I look like a dreamer? Only in Cinema movies US presidents save the World
Do I look like a dreamer?
Ummm...see comment #2.5
But-- don't you think that this will change under Obama?
Obama is better than Bush was, but it would be a stretch to call Obama a progressive.
Afghanistan is a hard nut to crack. There are two possible ways: a war of atrition on Taliban, or a negotiated solution mandated by the UN. A war of atrition means genocide, and therefore it is the wrong solution. A negotiated settlement would require an interim period, a UN Governorship like in Japan after the World War II. The difference would be that, in Afghanistan, the UN blue helmets would come from many nations, not just the United States. Beside the U.S., England, and Canada, I see a great role for Russia, China, and France in Afghanistan. China in particular has an impressive low-cost labor force, and therefore, why not, a low-cost blue helmet force? The coalition would stay on the sidelines, observing the transition, just as the U.S. is doing in Iraq. Imagine if a deal were struck to gradually replace all foreign troops with 200,000 blue helmets, under a strict UN supervision. The massive influx of such peacekeepers would quickly swing the balance towards peace. This would forestall the genocide of Taliban. Confronted with all other alternatives, the Taliban would have to go along, and would gradually be disarmed, choosing the most advantageous option of peaceful coexistence.
in the continuing Afghan Holocaust and Afghan Genocide (3-7 million violent and non-violent excess deaths, so far, under Bush and Obama)
Divide that number by a thousand and it becomes plausible for civilian deaths directly caused by violence.
The concept of non-violent excess deaths in the case of Afghanistan is beyond ridiculous. It demands an answer to an obvious question: What is the cause of these deaths?
Are we starving out whole towns and villages? No.
Are we depriving people of medical care? No. If anything the number of Afghan women who have died in childbirth has decreased over the past 8 years.
Are we forcing the poppy farmers to overdose on heroin? I would have to say no.
Well, I'm out of ideas.
Of course, it never hurts to blame the U.S., Israel, cable TV, high fructose corn syrup, or evil spirits whenever a theory has no basis in reality...
according to statistics i found: 15 million children in the us live in poverty. imagine if bush had spent $10 billion just for a couple months in new orleans after katrina instead of $10 billion per month in iraq?
easier to watch from a distance while playing guitar, while the sec of state buys shoes and the horse judge of a fema director flounders about=mission accomplished! no bid contracts to friends and vice presidents company for iraq re-build=mission accomplished! personal vendetta against saddam disguised as search for immiment wmd attack=mission accomplished! long resumes and years of experience but numerous domestic and international failures=mission accomplished! many in bush administration resign under cloud of incompetence or scandal=mission accomplished!
it would be laughable if not that over 4,000 US military and COUNTLESS iraqis paid with their lives.
Last thought - it's well and good to condemn genocide. In fact, it's pretty effortless.
So when will the UN actually jump in and halt a single episode of genocide? I doubt any of us will see that happen.
In spite of the hysterics over the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, you avoid another obvious question.
How many people are alive in both of those countries today compared to the millions who would have died had the reigns of the Taliban and Saddam Hussein continued?
In desperately poor Syria, only partially occupied and partially ethnically cleansed by Apartheid Israel, only subject to intemittent Israeli or US bombing,
Desperately poor Syria?
What did they do with all the money they made for 30 years when they occupied Lebanon and used it as a heroin factory?
Israel isn't occupying any of Syria. It won the Golan Heights fair and square because Syria attacked first. Syria can cry about its stupid decision at its leisure.
The U.S. has never bombed Syrian targets. Aside from chasing a few insurgents back across the Iraqi border, and that's a stretch.
let us also not forget that the ussr murdered up to 2 million afghani's, maimed many more, during their occupation.
i was going to link it to wiki but the editorial bent appeared queasily in favor of the occupation.
however presenting infant mortality rates as "preventable deaths" does not take for other contributing factors like previously extant bad medical practices etc.
employing this logic would place the us medical system as a "genocidal operator" as well, which would be a farce and deterimental to the use of such statistics.
interestingly enough the un world population prospector widget demonstrated an upswing in afghani population when taken for 1980 to 2010, crucial years of open warfare in that country.
your narrative is apt, but the 50 year old lexicon being used is repellent to the modern reader.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |